Hey there,
Here's what caught my attention this week:
blog.banast.as
I watched a video about orbital mechanics that broke my brain in the best way possible.
The setup is simple enough: you want to simulate an asteroid orbiting the sun, you know Newton's laws, you write the obvious code. Update position based on velocity, update velocity based on acceleration, run it. The orbit spirals outward, your asteroid escapes into the void, and your simulation breaks. This isn't a bug in your math - it's a fundamental problem with how you're stepping through time.
For decades, this meant simulating orbital dynamics over millions of years was essentially impossible. Not because computers were too slow, but because the algorithms themselves became unstable long before reaching those timescales.
Then in 1991, astrophysicists borrowed an idea from molecular dynamics. The fix was to swap two lines of code.
Same calculations, different order - update velocity first using current acceleration, then update position using the new velocity instead of the old one. The simulation that was fundamentally broken is now fundamentally stable. Billions of orbits with error staying below 10^-10, practically machine precision.
The answer lives in phase space. When particles move according to Newton's laws, they preserve certain geometric properties - specifically area. The naive algorithm violates this at each step, and those tiny violations accumulate until your simulation bears no resemblance to reality. The swapped algorithm preserves area exactly. You can run it forever and the fundamental geometry stays intact.
The payoff was immediate: scientists could finally watch the Kirkwood gaps form in their simulations - those empty regions in the asteroid belt that astronomers had noticed for 150 years but couldn't model because the algorithms broke down long before the gaps would emerge.
The best numerical methods aren't brute-force approximations - they're the ones that preserve what the physics says should be preserved, with the geometry of motion baked into the algorithm.
Two lines swapped. That's the difference between chaos and a solar system.
blog.google
Everyone was obsessed with Nano Banana in 2025, but Google's real story is about what happened behind the memes: AI image editing quietly became the default creative tool, not a specialist feature.
theregister.com
Nvidia's $20B "licensing deal" with Groq looks less like a partnership and more like a stealth acquisition designed to sidestep antitrust reviews - and the real target is Groq's SRAM technology that runs 10-80x faster than standard GPU memory.
futurism.com
A police department's AI system hallucinated an officer transforming into a frog because it was processing dialogue from a movie playing in the background, exposing the real cost of deploying language models to generate official documents without basic content filtering.